Colorado's Unified Improvement Plan for Schools

Aurora Frontier K-8 UIP 2024-25

      
 Download PDF

Content


  • Document icons and definitions

  • Priority Performance Challenges
  • Root Cause
  • Major Improvement Strategies
  • Action Steps
  • Progress Monitoring
  • Trend Direction

Executive Summary


Priority Performance Challenges Root Cause Major Improvement Strategies
  • Increase stretch growth data for students on IEPs.
  • Progress monitoring
  • Effective Progress Monitoring Strategies
  • Increase Achievement Data for Students with Disabilities


  • Access the School Performance Framework here: http://www.cde.state.co.us/schoolview/performance

    Access the Literacy Curriculum Transparency Dashboard here: https://www.cde.state.co.us/code/literacycurriculumtransparency-dashboard

    Improvement Plan Information


    Additional Information about the school


    Aurora Frontier is a school serving preschool through 8th grade students in Southeast Aurora. Enrollment for the 2024-2025 school year is as follows: Total Student enrollment: 748 - Hispanic/Latino: 32% - White: 26.5% - Black/African American: 17.8% - Asian: 14% - Two or more races: 8.7% - Native American: .5% - Native Hawaiian: .5% - Free Lunch: 51.7% - Reduced Lunch: 9.4% - ELL: 36.76% - GT: 8.3% - SWD: 15.5%

    Improvement Plan Information

    The school/district is submitting this improvement plan to satisfy requirements for (check all that apply):


    -->

    Narrative on Data Analysis and Root Cause Identification


    Prior Year Targets

    Provide a summary of your progress in implementing the Major Improvement Strategies and if they had the intended effect on systems, adult actions, and student outcomes (e.g. targets).


    Based on your reflection and evaluation, provide a summary of the adjustments that you will make for this year's plan.

    Current Performance

    As an Instructional Leadership team, we dug into the past three year's of our School Performance Framework, CMAS data, and IReady data to identify trends across our systems, and one area where we all landed was that we are not meeting the needs of our students on IEPs.


    Based on current IReady and previous years' CMAS data, it was discovered that our students on IEPs who are above GL and multiple years below GL are not growing or meeting proficiency at the same rate(s) as their peers. Therefore, we view this as an area on which we can focus for our first semester. Our findings indicate a need for focused monitoring systems unique to each standard and curricular resource. With these added supports from an instructional planning perspective, students will have more tools to craft growth goals, create a plan to meet those goals, and understand how to self check for understanding and if they are meeting the learning objectives as they relate to the standard(s). This will increase their ability to own their learning and set realistic goals, see themselves in the work, and gain a sense of confidence about who they are as learners. Our goals are to create independent students who have the tools to be successful in any aspect of school and life. Our work around progress monitoring and executive functioning will both support teachers in their intentionality around planning and also support students in increasing their awareness of who they are and where they are in relation to their grade level standards.


    Priority Performance Challenge and Associated Root Cause

    Priority Performance Challenge:  Increase stretch growth data for students on IEPs.

    Area of Focus: English/Language Arts growth


    Root Cause: Progress monitoring

    The root cause of the problem of practice is that teachers are not utilizing specific tools to monitor progress along a standard’s progression. We do not use formative assessments to push instructional decisions Teachers were not strategically supported in how to move past the summative assessments as a data point by which to monitor Leaders have not worked with staff/ILT to create an emphasis on real time data monitoring to inform instructional decisions Using the Learning Target (standard) to assess in the moment AND after instruction

    Root Cause Category: Data Analysis


    Priority Performance Challenge:  Increase Achievement Data for Students with Disabilities

    Area of Focus: English/Language Arts achievement



    Action and Progress Monitoring Plans

    Major Improvement Strategy and Action Plan

    > >

    Effective Progress Monitoring Strategies

    Describe the research/evidence base supporting the strategy:

    Based on current IReady data, it was discovered that our students who are above GL and multiple years below GL are not growing at the same rate(s) as their peers. Therefore, we view this as an area on which we can focus for our first semester. Our findings indicate a need for focused monitoring systems unique to each standard and curricular resource.

    Strategy Category:

    Instructional Leadership

    Associated Root Causes:

    Progress monitoring: The root cause of the problem of practice is that teachers are not utilizing specific tools to monitor progress along a standard’s progression. We do not use formative assessments to push instructional decisions Teachers were not strategically supported in how to move past the summative assessments as a data point by which to monitor Leaders have not worked with staff/ILT to create an emphasis on real time data monitoring to inform instructional decisions Using the Learning Target (standard) to assess in the moment AND after instruction

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status
    See 90 Day plan

    Bryan Gasior and Kelly Lopata

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status

    Progress Monitoring: Student Target Setting

    Priority Performance Challenge : Increase stretch growth data for students on IEPs.

    Performance Indicator:

    Measures / Metrics:

    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2024-2025: By the end of the 24-25 school year, our target goal is to increase the percentage of students who meet their stretch growth by 10% as measured by IReady.
    2025-2026:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2024-2025:

    Priority Performance Challenge : Increase Achievement Data for Students with Disabilities

    Performance Indicator:

    Measures / Metrics:

    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2024-2025: Our target of the 2024-2025 SY is to move our mean score to 722.3 as measured by CMAS
    2025-2026:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2024-2025:

    Attachments List

    © 2017 State of Colorado