Colorado's Unified Improvement Plan for Schools

Pinello Elementary School UIP 2024-25

      
 Download PDF

Content


  • Document icons and definitions

  • Priority Performance Challenges
  • Root Cause
  • Major Improvement Strategies
  • Action Steps
  • Progress Monitoring
  • Trend Direction

Executive Summary


Priority Performance Challenges Root Cause Major Improvement Strategies
  • Math CMAS Achievement
  • Lack of backwards planning
  • Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning
  • Planning
  • Data Collaboration
  • ELA CMAS Growth
  • Lack of backwards planning
  • Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning
  • Written Response Expectation
  • Planning
  • Data Collaboration
  • READ Plans
  • Lack of High levels of Tier I Instruction
  • Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning
  • Lack of backwards planning
  • Accountability and Support
  • Planning
  • Data Collaboration


  • Access the School Performance Framework here: http://www.cde.state.co.us/schoolview/performance

    Access the Literacy Curriculum Transparency Dashboard here: https://www.cde.state.co.us/code/literacycurriculumtransparency-dashboard

    Improvement Plan Information


    Additional Information about the school



    Improvement Plan Information

    The school/district is submitting this improvement plan to satisfy requirements for (check all that apply):


    Checked
    Checked    Colorado Turnaround Network Grant
    -->

    Narrative on Data Analysis and Root Cause Identification


    Description of School Setting and Process for Data Analysis

    Description of School Context: The Pinello administrative team consists of one counselor, one social worker,  a full time assistant principal, and a principal.  Our instructional team consists of 12 classroom teachers encompassing two teachers in kindergarten-5th Grade. The support staff consists of two Title I teachers, two special education teachers, twelve special education educational assistants, two significant support needs teacher, a part-time English language learner teacher, one full time speech language teacher and one part time virtual speech language teacher, one gifted and talented teacher, one physical education teacher, one music teacher, and one STEM teacher.  Currently 19% of the teachers have three or less years of experience. One hundred percent of the teachers contracted at Pinello Elementary are highly qualified. 69% percent of our student population qualified for free and reduced lunch in the previous year.  

    School Vision :  Pinello staff believes achievement including every student matters and every moment counts.

    School Goals: 1: Increase student growth in math and reading but establishing data driven instruction, vertical alignment and building learning walks. 2. Provide opportunities to engage and involve parents and families in the school community. 3. Establish consistent assessments of professional development.

    Description of Planning Process:  The UIP development process includes Pinello staff analyzing and discussing current data, historical trends, and short term and long term goals. Members of the Building Leadership Team begin meeting in September to determine priority performance challenges and root causes using both local and state data. Parents and other members of BAAC and PTO also provide input into the UIP process. The UIP serves as a comprehensive needs assessment to guide the comprehensive school-wide plan. 

    Behavior Support: 
    Pinello Elementary has a Positive Behavior Intervention Support program.  Specific behavior expectations are clearly established, defined, explicitly taught to students and prominently displayed throughout the school.  The school-wide behavior expectations are defined as R.O.A.R – R- Respectful, O – Organized, A - Always Safe, and R -Responsible. Students are recognized for adhering to these school-wide expectations by receiving a ROAR Award.  Students read the ''character trait'' of the week on the morning announcements. The school adopted a school-wide social emotional program (Capturing Kids' Hearts) to support student teacher relationships. Last year Pinello achieved National Showcase status for our implementation of CKH.  A disciplinary infraction policy is in place for students who are in violation of school and classroom rules.  Data regarding disciplinary infractions, referrals and suspensions are collected and analyzed by the PBIS team and presented to the rest of the staff on a monthly basis. The team meets monthly to review data and make program improvements.  Pinello Elementary is also part of the district Positive Action Team. This group organizes activities to benefit the community. The school has established a student Link Crew which plans school-wide events to support positive behavior and to recognize good deeds.
     
    Support Services (Special Education Services, English Language Learners, and Gifted): 
    Pinello Elementary provides specialized individual services in the area of ELL, Gifted and Talented, and Special Education for students who have been identified.  Each student that is identified has a tailored Education Plan that ensures the services are provided in direct alignment with the identified student's education goals.

    Student Demographics:
    Student enrollment at Pinello Elementary is approximately 300 students in grades K-5. Our student body consists of 37% white not Hispanic, 42% Hispanic, <1% Black, <1% multiple races, <1% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander and <1% American Indian or Alaskan Native. 69% of our students qualify for free/reduced lunch.
     
     
    Title 1:
    Pinello Elementary recognizes the importance of parent engagement and communication in the success of students.  The school implements the MTSS initiative to support parent engagement, as communication remains increasingly important.  Pinello Elementary regularly engages in parent involvement activities for our Title 1 students. At the beginning of each school year, the Title 1 teachers invite parents to a parent compact meeting where they explain the program to parents and seek parental participation through a question and answer session. Parents are also encouraged to provide ideas and input for the Compact. In addition, 4 times a year Pinello offers Academic Nights that focus on academic enrichment in literacy, math, and STEM. We engage parents through conferences, weekly emails via parent portal (Remind software), open house, programs, and special activities.  Additionally, through our newsletter we send home tips on how parents can become involved in their child’s education and support their child at home.  We engage parents in the development of improvement plans and have participation in BAAC, PBIS and PTO committees. 
     
    The Title I team and classroom teachers use a combination of CMAS, DIBELS Next, intervention program assessments (SIPPS  etc.), i-Ready, STAR Reading, common interim assessments, formative checks, and classroom data to identify students who require additional support. These groups are flexible.

    MTSS: Pinello has a MTSS team that consists of a building administrator, counselor, Title I teachers, specials teacher and classroom teachers. They provide professional development on the MTSS process to the staff, meet monthly to discuss student data and goals for students who are on or being placed on an MTSS plan. Members of the team meet with assigned teachers to assist with writing goals, determine interventions, how to track student progress and follow up with next steps. Pinello Elementary uses Tier I, Tier II and Tier III interventions to ensure students have multiple opportunities to support student needs.

    Transitions Meetings: Each spring, Kindergarten teachers attend a preschool parent night to answer questions parents may have about Kindergarten. Pinello also works to provide a smooth transition from preschool by having  Kindergarten Round-up. This provides parents an opportunity to meet with classroom teacher and learn about the different skills they can work on with their child over the summer. To ensure all measures are in place prior to  students starting Kindergarten, a special education teacher and Kindergarten teacher from Pinello attend staffing meetings at the Pre school.

    Extended Learning Opportunities: Pinello Elementary offers a range of extended learning opportunities both before and after school hours. Opportunities include Running Clubs, Lego Robotics Clubs, Jr., Lego Robotics Club, Student Counsel/Link Crew, Environmental Club, Battle of the Books, choir, and scouts. 

    Prior Year Targets

    Provide a summary of your progress in implementing the Major Improvement Strategies and if they had the intended effect on systems, adult actions, and student outcomes (e.g. targets).

    Performance Indicator Disaggregated Achievement: 40% of students showed typical, above or well above growth on the zones of growth on Dibels. Which did not meet the 50% goal Of the students that are on read plans, 70% of the students on read plans are identified special education students in Reading.

    Performance Indicator: Academic Growth: ELA-Pinello scored a 42% in the growth profile for ELA, which did not meet the 50% goal. Math-Pinello scored a 62% on the growth profile for math, which put us above the 50%.

    Prior years major improvement strategies: In the accountability and support section, teachers were provided with coaching using the observation and feedback cycle. All teachers were trained using the TLC 3.0. We discussed different parts of the TLC during staff meetings and PLC's. Teachers that needed more support were given longer coaching cycles. We also used teacher observation as a way for teachers to see strong examples of the TLC in practice. 

    Data Collaboration: We changed from having separate data meetings to having everything in our PLC time. Teachers were provided with two one hour sessions weekly to have extended PLC/data time. As a building we used I Ready and Dibels as our primary from of data tracking. This was our first year doing it this way.

    Planning: Building leadership and instructional coach attended PLC's as a part of the team. The PLC time was extended from 30 minutes twice a week to 1 hour. We had a set of guiding questions that we used. We started to lean into the use of exemplars during 2nd semester. As a team we also developed a response to reading guide that is used during our PLC time. The instructional team guided teachers in looking at PDSA data, and building data goals. 


    Based on your reflection and evaluation, provide a summary of the adjustments that you will make for this year's plan.

    We will continue to have all areas be our focus. We did not have to hire any new staff, and made some adjustments to teachers in grade levels they are better suited. The teachers are understanding the data better, and we are starting to see increases in percent of student proficient on Dibels and I Ready this year. We are decreasing the number of students that are requiring intervention, thus leaving the students engaged in high levels of Tier I instruction. 

    Our next major focus this year is professional development around priority standards, success criteria, and data analysis. We are working on teachers understanding backwards planning, student proficiency on the standard, Tier I intervention along with extension when students have shown proficiency. 

    This then that shows that all of our prior years major improvement strategies should stay the same. We will just be digging deeper within each one. We are making progress in individual areas, but we have not shown enough growth to move on to other goals.

    Current Performance



    Pinello is currently rated performance plan for our 2024 data. The Performance rating shows that we have an academic achievement rating of approaching in both ELA and Math.  The 2024 growth sections is approaching for ELA and Meets for math.  There is one area Does not Meet within the academic achievement section ELA: Students with Disabilities (1st percentile), Math students with disabilities (1st percentile). This shows our disaggregated sections improved from 2023 where we did not meet in the free and reduced lunch section as well.

    Pinello has been Performance for the last couple of years. We have maintained performance by only a couple percentage points above the cutoff. It is a goal of our school to make significant growth to put us at a percentage higher than the cutoff to maintain as a performance school. We would like to also get above 48% (Approaching) in achievement where in 2024 and 2019 we achieved our highest percentage. 
     

    Trend Analysis

    Trend Direction: Stable
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Achievement (Status)

    ELA-2024 data is as such 3rd Grade Reading achievement is 48.8, 4th is 40.49, 5th grade is 31.2. 2023 data is as such; 3rd grade STAR Reading achievement is 45.1% is at/above benchmark. 4th Grade STAR Reading achievement is 51.1% at/ above. 5th Grade STAR Reading Achievement is 36.7% at/above grade level. This data shows an an increase as opposed to the years prior. Due to the pandemic,2021 local data shows 3rd grade STAR Reading achievement as compared to state data is at 21.5% at/above benchmark. 4th grade STAR Reading achievement as compared to state data is at 22% at/above benchmark. 5th grade STAR Reading achievement as compared to state data is at 28% at/above benchmark. ELA: Prior to the pandemic the three year data showed that 3rd grade CMAS ELA scores went from 24% meet/exceeds to 27.1% meets/exceeds to 36.7% meets/exceeds. 4th grade went from 27.1% meets/exceeds, to 29% meet/exceeded, to 33.3% meet/exceeded. 5th grade went from 37% meets/exceeds, to 33.8% meets/exceeded, to 32.7% meets/exceeded. 3rd grade increased by 9.6 percent points, 4th grade increased by 4.3 percent points, and 5th grade decreased by 1.1 percent points.
    Trend Direction: Increasing then stable
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Achievement (Status)

    Math-2024 data is a such' 3rd grade Achievement is 44.2, 4th is 41%, 5th is 55.1%.2023 data is such; 3rd grade STAR Math achievement is 30% at/above benchmark, 4th Grade is 52.2% of students are at/above grade level, 5th grade is 55.1% of students at/above grade level. Data is showing an increase in all grade levels from years prior. Due to the pandemic, local 2022 data shows 3rd grade STAR math achievement as compared to state data is at 12.5% at/above benchmark. 4th grade STAR math achievement as compared to state data is at 5% at/above benchmark. 5th grade STAR match achievement as compared to state data is at 10% at/above benchmark. Math: Prior to the pandemic the three year data trend shows that 3rd grade data went from 11% meets/exceeds, to 29.2% meets/exceeds, to 28% meets/exceeds. 4th grade went from 29% meet/exceeds, to 14.6% meets/exceeds, to 13.7% meet/exceeds. 5th grade went from 16% meet/exceeds, to 23.9% meet/exceeds, to 18.4% meet/exceeds. 3rd grade decreased by 1.2 percent points, 4th grade decreased by .9 percent points, and 5th grade decreased by 5.5 percent points.
    Trend Direction: Decreasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Achievement (Status)

    READ Plans: The number of students who are SRD at the end of the school year has went from 2017-22 2018-37 2019-46 2021-66 2022-69 2023-64 2024-44 The trend is showing a large decrease in the number of students on a read plan.Between 2022 and 2023 we increased the number of students in the school but only decreased the number of read plans by a few. The trend is decreasing but only by a little.
    Trend Direction: Decreasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Growth

    ELA-local 2024 data shows that our median growth percentile is 42.0 which is lower than the year before and not above the 50th percentile, local 2023 data shows that our median growth percentile at 45 with the expectation being that we should be at 50 SGP for 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade. The data still shows an increase of 14 points from the year prior. Due to the pandemic, local 2022 data shows our median growth percentile at 36 with the expectation that we should be at 50 SGP for 3rd, 4th and 5th grade STAR Reading data. ELA: In 2017 we received a growth rating of Meets for ELA. In 2018 we received a growth rating of Approaching in ELA. In 2019 we received a growth rating of Meets for ELA.
    Trend Direction: Increasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Growth

    Math-2024 data shows a percentile of 56% which is above the 50 percentile goal and higher than last year,2023 data shows Pinello's median growth percentile of 51, which is above the 50 SGP that is expected. We saw an increase of 5 from the previous year. Due to the pandemic, local 2022 data shows Pinello's median growth percentile at 45 with the expectation that we should be at 50 SGP for 3rd, 4th and 5th grade STAR Math data. Math: In 2017, we received an academic growth rating of Does Not Meet In 2018, we received an academic growth rating of Approaching In 2019, we received an academic growth rating of Approaching
    Trend Direction: Increasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Disaggregated Growth

    2024 Free and reduced lunch eligible was 44 for ELA and 62 for Math which showed a large increase. 2023 Free and Reduced lunch eligible students was 40 for ELA and 39 for Math growth, which falls into the approaching category. The data is showing that it is staying the same from previous years. Due to the pandemic, there is no local data to determine trends. Prior to the pandemic, ELA & Math: Free and Reduced lunch eligible students in 2017 was Did Not Meet, and in 2018 & 2019 the Free and Reduced lunch eligible students rating is Approaching in both ELA and Math.

    Additional Trend Information:

    A trend statement for 2024 is we are making gains with free and reduced lunch students. We are seeing more of an increase in math, and still have some growth work in ELA, along with achievement in all areas.

    One trend to note for 2023 is We had about 30 students return from online learning from the year before. 

    Priority Performance Challenge and Associated Root Cause

    Priority Performance Challenge:  Math CMAS Achievement

    Achievement went up in 2024 but are still beneath 30%, but is still not at above the 50th percentile. Significant low achievement in math was the same as 2022. Third, fourth, and fifth grade achievement still showed less than 30% of students at or above state benchmark.

    Area of Focus: Math achievement


    Root Cause: Lack of backwards planning

    Strategic planning in instructional collaboration do not consistently show the use of backwards planning as it connects to lesson learning targets and success criteria (lesson outcomes).

    Root Cause: Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning

    Teachers planning with high level focuses on instructional strategies that has an impact on student learning.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  ELA CMAS Growth

    2024- The statement from the previous year still stands with being below the growth of 50th percentile. 2023-Student growth in 3rd, 4th and 5th are below the standard growth percentile of 50. We received an approaching rating in ELA growth.

    Area of Focus: English/Language Arts growth


    Root Cause: Lack of backwards planning

    Strategic planning in instructional collaboration do not consistently show the use of backwards planning as it connects to lesson learning targets and success criteria (lesson outcomes).

    Root Cause: Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning

    Teachers planning with high level focuses on instructional strategies that has an impact on student learning.

    Root Cause: Written Response Expectation

    Teachers need a better understanding of CMAS written responses. They need to build an exemplar that matches the rubrics and them hold students to those written expectations.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  READ Plans

    2024-The number of SRD students decreased by 20 from the year before.The number of students with a significant reading deficiency had increased over the last two years prior and in 2023 they decreased a very small percentage.


    Root Cause: Lack of High levels of Tier I Instruction

    Use of TLC 3.0 training to implement high levels of Tier I instruction.

    Root Cause Category: Instruction

    Root Cause: Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning

    Teachers planning with high level focuses on instructional strategies that has an impact on student learning.

    Root Cause: Lack of backwards planning

    Strategic planning in instructional collaboration do not consistently show the use of backwards planning as it connects to lesson learning targets and success criteria (lesson outcomes).


    Why were these challenges selected and what is the magnitude of the overall performance challenges:

    The following rational applies to Pinello's challenges for ELA and Math.  Academic Achievement and Growth. 

     Academic Achievement:
    • Inconsistency in use of rigorous instruction that promotes student achievement and growth. 
    • Inconsistency in fidelity to written curriculum documents.
    • Inconsistency in the depth of collaborative planning. 
    • Inconsistency in the use of data to drive instruction.

    How were the Root Causes were selected and verified:

    After reviewing our priority performance challenge, we identified significant root causes that have impacted achievement and growth. 

    Root Cause Analysis:
    In identifying data from CMAS, Dibels and STAR and in collaboration with parents, classroom teachers, EAs, district administration and building leadership team the root causes for our challenges were determined. Based on data and feedback, these areas have determined to be the root cause and have a significant impact on student growth and achievement. This is presented to BAAC and PTO and modifications are made to the plan as a result of their feedback. 


     

    Additional Narrative / Conclusion

    Students of all disaggregated groups take courses of similar challenge throughout the school and there are no discrepancies of note that require further action.

    Action and Progress Monitoring Plans

    Major Improvement Strategy and Action Plan

    > >

    Planning

    What will success look like:

    100% of teachers will use the components of an effective PLC. This will be evidenced by teachers discussing their during their PLC's building curriculum, data, engagement strategies, and flexible grouping. Building leadership (administration and instructional coach) will attend collaborate to plan grade level meetings. Teachers will actively reference guiding questions to support lesson planning including exemplars and how instruction will be presented to students.

    Describe the research/evidence base supporting the strategy:

    We need to evaluate our own instruction in order to meet the needs of all students.

    Strategy Category:

    Instructional Evaluation

    Associated Root Causes:

    Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning: Teachers planning with high level focuses on instructional strategies that has an impact on student learning.

    Lack of backwards planning: Strategic planning in instructional collaboration do not consistently show the use of backwards planning as it connects to lesson learning targets and success criteria (lesson outcomes).

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status
    C2P Instructional leadership will attend collaborate to plan grade level meetings. 09/18/2023
    05/23/2025
    Weekly
    Principal, Assistant Principal and Instructional Coach

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    C2P Observation
    Administration and instructional coaches will consistently join collaborate to plan meetings supporting and guiding discussions. 08/25/2021
    05/22/2020
    -Collaborate to Plan Guiding Questions Document Classroom teachers, building coach and administration
    > >

    Data Collaboration

    What will success look like:

    100% of teachers will incorporate data collaboration into their PLC's. Collaboratively the team will identify student learning gaps and adjust instruction that reflects each individual students needs. Teachers will come prepared with Exit tickets data, exemplars, and PDSA's. They will also use I Ready, Dibels, and STAR data to track student growth and need.

    Describe the research/evidence base supporting the strategy:

    The school's CMAS data has improved in some areas, but remained stagnant in others.

    Strategy Category:

    Data Analysis & Reflection Practices

    Associated Root Causes:

    Inconsistent high levels of collaborative planning: Teachers planning with high level focuses on instructional strategies that has an impact on student learning.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status
    Data Driven Instruction Weekly math or ELA data will be discussed during data meetings. Interventions and instructional next steps will be planned according to data. 08/25/2021
    05/20/2022
    Weekly
    Classroom teachers, instructional coach and administration
    Reference Materials Teams and administration will use Common Core Companion books to guide instruction and student misconceptions. 08/25/2021
    05/20/2022
    Monthly
    Classroom teachers, instructional coach and administration

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    Admin Observation
    Administration and the coach will consistently join and lead data meetings. Supporting the discussion and steps that need to be taken based on data. 08/19/2019
    05/22/2020
    -Exit Tickets -PDSA Document -DDI Document Classroom teachers, instructional coach and administration
    DDI and PDSA
    Provide support for analyzing and using data. 08/25/2021
    05/20/2022
    -DDI & PDSA Documents Classroom teachers, instructional coach and administration
    > >

    Accountability and Support

    What will success look like:

    Administrators and coach will use observation and feedback cycles to monitor progress around the instructional vision and the implementation of the Teaching and Learning Cycle best practices including actionable feedback. Teachers will be provided with professional development around the Teaching and Learning Cycle and that PD will be connected to PLC's and coaching.

    Describe the research/evidence base supporting the strategy:

    High Tier I instruction leads to student growth and achievement, and with continuous feedback we will be able to achieve our academic goals.

    Strategy Category:

    Continuous Improvement

    Associated Root Causes:

    Lack of High levels of Tier I Instruction: Use of TLC 3.0 training to implement high levels of Tier I instruction.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status
    Actionable Feedback Administration will track areas of non-evident and actionable feedback. 08/25/2021
    05/20/2022
    Monthly
    Administration
    Instructional Team Planning The building instructional team will use feedback to determine areas of need and plan professional development to meet those instructional needs. 08/25/2021
    05/20/2022
    Monthly
    Administration and Instructional Coach

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    Professional Development
    Data from the Feedback Tracker is used to determine professional development that will directly impact teacher instructional practices. 08/25/2021
    05/20/2022
    -O/F Tracker -TLC -Get Better Faster Book Administration
    O/F Cycle
    Administration created observation feedback schedule and tracker. 08/25/2021
    05/20/2022
    -O/F Tracker -O/F Schedule Administration

    Progress Monitoring: Student Target Setting

    Priority Performance Challenge : Math CMAS Achievement

    Priority Performance Challenge : ELA CMAS Growth

    Priority Performance Challenge : READ Plans

    Performance Indicator:

    Disaggregated Achievement

    Measures / Metrics:

    R
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2024-2025:
    2025-2026:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2024-2025:

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Growth

    Measures / Metrics:

    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2024-2025:
    2025-2026:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2024-2025:

    Attachments List

    © 2017 State of Colorado