Colorado's Unified Improvement Plan for Schools

The Classical Academy Charter UIP 2023-24

      
 Download PDF

Content


  • Document icons and definitions

  • Priority Performance Challenges
  • Root Cause
  • Major Improvement Strategies
  • Action Steps
  • Progress Monitoring
  • Trend Direction

Executive Summary


Priority Performance Challenges Root Cause Major Improvement Strategies
  • ELA and Math Achievement
  • Teacher collaboration
  • Structures and effectiveness
  • Shared ownership
  • Staff Collaboration
  • Alignment of Curriculum and Instruction
  • High Quality Instruction
  • Math Growth
  • Linking data to instruction
  • Training and development
  • Low participation rates
  • Alignment of Curriculum and Instruction
  • Utilize Student Data
  • High Quality Instruction
  • Participation Rates
  • ELA Academic Growth
  • Linking data to instruction
  • Alignment of Curriculum and Instruction
  • Utilize Student Data


  • Access the School Performance Framework here: http://www.cde.state.co.us/schoolview/performance

    Access the Literacy Curriculum Transparency Dashboard here: https://www.cde.state.co.us/code/literacycurriculumtransparency-dashboard

    Improvement Plan Information


    Additional Information about the school



    Improvement Plan Information

    The school/district is submitting this improvement plan to satisfy requirements for (check all that apply):


    Checked
    -->

    Narrative on Data Analysis and Root Cause Identification


    Description of School Setting and Process for Data Analysis

    The Classical Academy (TCA) is the largest brick and mortar K-12th grade charter school in Colorado. Launched in 1997 with 400 students, TCA currently enrolls approximately 3,600 students on three campuses in seven schools with one vision. An additional 7,000 children are on our waiting list. TCA alone is larger than 75% of the public school districts in Colorado. TCA’s demographics reflect the demographics of northern El Paso County where it is located. 

    Since its inception, TCA has embraced a philosophy that guides all instruction - and it has come to be known as TCA’s Educational Philosophy. Selected aspects of Classical Education, the Socratic Method, the writings of turn-of-the-century British educator, Charlotte Mason, form the basis for this philosophy. Over the last decade and particularly in recent years, it has become apparent through everyday application that these three strands of thinking intertwine beautifully providing student with a highly effective K-12 experience. TCA’s Educational Philosophy is elegantly divided into 4 ''big ideas'' that clearly demonstrate our approach to education.

    TCA is:

    · Whole Person Focused – The TCA community will endeavor to foster and nurture a warm learning environment for students in which students will learn healthy habits of mind, body, and spirit formed thoughtfully and responsibly.

    · Relationship Based – Teachers masterfully facilitate and support healthy, beneficial relationships allowing students to acquire authentic character. While interpersonal relationships are critical, it is also important for students to develop relationships with subject matter, as well as the world around them.

    · Classically Oriented – Teachers masterfully guide learning through questioning based on appropriate developmental stages of learning. Students are inspired toward a lifelong pursuit of truth, beauty, and goodness.

    · Idea Centered – Teachers recognize that inspirational ideas and truth are the real food for the student’s mind. Living books, original source documents, musical pieces, artwork, and nature itself provide these inspirational ideas.

    These ideas, when fully embraced, provide an exceptional educational experience that is in alignment with and fully supports TCA’s Mission Statement: The Classical Academy exists to assist parents in their mission to develop exemplary citizens equipped with analytical thinking skills, virtuous character, and a passion for learning, all built upon a solid foundation of knowledge.

    The UIP and data analysis process engaged the input of the Principals, Assistant Principals, Dean of Educational Philosophy, Director of Student Support Services, and the Compliance Officer. School Accountability Committees, including teachers and parents, met to review the UIPs. TCA Elementary consists of three elementary schools on three different campuses: TCA Central Elementary, TCA East Elementary, and TCA North Elementary. About 1800 students, Grades K-6, are enrolled.
    User-added image

    Prior Year Targets

    Provide a summary of your progress in implementing the Major Improvement Strategies and if they had the intended effect on systems, adult actions, and student outcomes (e.g. targets).

    TCA Elementary continues to work collaboratively with Student Support Services to meet the needs of students with disabilities. Building level meetings continue to benefit students with disabilities as general education and student support services work together to maximize learning. Student support services has begun to calibrate assessments to support struggling learners and to push into the general education classroom.

    2023
    ELA - Students with disabilities scored in the approaching rating with a mean scale score of 725.2 and participation rate of 73.3%. We did not meet our expected goal to maintain 745.1. 
    Math- Students with disabilities scored in the approaching rating with a mean scale score of 723.3 and participation rate of 71.7%. We did not meet our expected goal of 740.
    We believe both scores are reflective of the low participation rate in this subgroup compared to the past years. 


    Based on your reflection and evaluation, provide a summary of the adjustments that you will make for this year's plan.

    We will continue to pursue a collaborative approach between general education and special education to support struggling learners. 

    Current Performance

    2023 Student Performance – What can state assessment results tell you about student learning?
    Spring 2023 state tests and expectations were consistent with tests from previous years at TCA.  State assessments were given in a paper-pencil format as in previous years. 

    TCA Elementary notes that each state assessment (by subject and grade level) has maintained the same performance range as previous years. TCA Elementary exceeds both the district and the State of Colorado in every assessment given this school year.   

    2023 Participation Rates Analysis
    TCA Elementary schools received a low participation rating with 90% of the eligible student body participating in CMAS. Principals addressed low participation with each School Accountability Committee (SAC) to gain insight into why parents were opting students out and took suggestions on how to best increase participation given our population. Participation did increase significantly over the course of the past five years through open parent communication and continued partnership with the community.
    TCA Elementary had a participation rate over 90% and was at or above the district and state rates in each mandated content area. Many of the opt-outs received were due to illness or parents not wanting to stress their already taxed student.


    Current Year Results CMAS- overall 
    User-added imageUser-added image

    DATA FROM 2018- 2023
    In fall of 2019, TCA Elementary was awarded a performance plan with an overall rating of Performance Plan: Low Participation.  
    TCA Elementary did not meet the 95% student participation rate in all areas.   We will continue to reinforce the value of assessment with our school community in order to effectively evaluate instruction that will best meet our students’ needs.  
    User-added imageUser-added imageUser-added image

    2023 READ Act Data
    TCA Elementary K-6 uses a core reading program of Spalding: Writing Road to Reading. Supplemental reading programs for K-3 include SPIRE, HillSprings Learning Center, Orton-Gillingham International (OGI/Yoshimoto Reading Instruction, and Take Flight. Students with significant reading deficiency (SRD) K-3 are receiving evidence-based reading instruction using SPIRE or Take Flight.  Early Literacy Grant was being utilized at one campus. 

    User-added image
    TCA Reading Curriculum
    The Spalding Method, as laid out in The Writing Road to Reading, is a comprehensive, multisensory, integrated language arts program that includes all the evidence-based components of systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, systematic phonics, vocabulary, oral reading fluency and text comprehension as identified by the Nation Reading Panel (NRP).  Phonemic awareness training is included within daily spelling routines using high-frequency words and including phoneme manipulation tasks such as identifying individual sounds, segmenting, counting, blending and recognizing initial sounds, ending sounds and medial sounds, as well as identifying same and then different sounds in spoken words and rhymes.   Spalding uses a systematic approach for phonics instruction, linking sounds and letters with printed words.   Vocabulary is taught by building a mental lexicon of words encountered in text.  It uses high-frequency core vocabulary words, and extends vocabulary through the use of fine literature.  Oral reading fluency is developed with the regular use of proven strategies to help automate the reading process.  Text comprehension incorporates five proven comprehension strategies; self-monitory, making connections, predicting text structure as well as likely outcomes and events, categorizing information, and summarizing.  The Spalding Method is built upon four major research domains related to reading process and reading development, basic skills mastery, and effective instruction.  With its diagnostic approach to the essential components of reading, The Spalding Method helps teachers easily create learning plans for individual children and classroom subgroups using proven instruction techniques.  The Spalding Method has a variety of diagnostic tools integrated into daily, weekly, and monthly classroom activities and has an interdisciplinary focus to provide opportunities for children to apply reading skills across subject areas.  All of The Classical Academy’s kindergarten through fifth grade teachers have completed the Spalding teacher-training course which focuses on the essential skills and behaviors identified by the Nation Reading Panel (NRP) and is accredited by the International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council (IMSLEC).
     
    Outline of information from a Spalding brochure ''How Spalding’s The Writing Road to Reading addresses the essential instructional components for early reading instruction outlined in the 2000 National Reading Panel Report''

    The Spalding Method, as laid out in The Writing Road to Reading, is a total language arts program that includes instruction in spelling, writing, and reading. It integrates content, principles, and procedures that empower teachers to be successful decision makers, equipping them with the ability to help all students learn to read and write.
    How the time-proven Spalding Method prepares students for a lifetime of reading

    • Instructionally sound; providing systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, systematic phonics, vocabulary, fluency and text comprehension as identified by the Nation Reading Panel (NRP).
      • Phonemic Awareness: Hearing Sounds in Spoken Words        
        • Incorporated within daily spelling routines using high-frequency words
        • Includes teacher-led and independent practice for the following phonemic manipulation asks:
          • Identifying individual sounds in spoken words
          • Segmenting spoken high-frequency words into individual sounds
          • Counting sounds within spoken words
          • Blending sounds into spoken words
          • Recognizing initial sounds, then ending sounds, and finally middle (medial) sounds
          • Identifying same and then different sounds in spoken words and rhymes
      • Systematic Phonics: Linking Sounds and Letters with Printed Words
        • Uses a systematic approach to help children quickly master saying and writing the 70 symbols (phonograms) that represent 45 speech sounds
        • Includes daily oral and written phonogram reviews to reinforce phonics skills
        • Equips students to spell accurately and to decode unfamiliar words by applying phonics skills to reading text
        • Connect speech to print with a unique and time-tested marking system
        • Employs daily spelling dictation to lay the groundwork for segmenting spoken words and blending phonograms into high frequency regular and irregular words (important prerequisites for faster success with reading)
        • Integrates precise handwriting techniques with sound-symbol relationships as a multi-sensory bridge between essential phonics skills and their practical application for writing and reading
        • Proves opportunities to apply newly learned and reinforced phonics skills through reading words by sound or syllable. 
      • Vocabulary: Building a Mental Lexicon of Words Encountered in Text
        • Uses high-frequency core vocabulary words as the foundation for vocabulary instruction
        • Teaches word parts as well as usage and meanings
        • Coaches children to use these words to construct oral and then written sentences in preparation for reading
        • Extends vocabulary through use of fine literature and extensive independent reading
      • Fluency: Developing Automatic and Expressive Reading
        • Structures the development of fluency skills with the regular use of proven strategies to help automate the reading process such as:
          • Developing automatic word recognition as children read new words used in normal speech – a critical prerequisite for reading text fluently with comprehension.
          • Modeling intonation, expression, and fluent reading
          • Proving specific and immediate teacher feedback as students read orally to develop accuracy, proper expression, and speed in daily reading lessons
        • Monitors students’ fluency progress with teacher-administration Oral Reading Assessments
      • Text Comprehension: using Strategies to Gain meaning from Text
        • Incorporates five proven comprehension strategies that build solid text comprehension skills:
          • Self-Monitoring of comprehension while listening and reading
          • Making connections between prior knowledge and text
          • Predicting author’s purpose, type of writing, as well as likely outcomes and events
          • Categorizing information by using graphic organizers, such as outlines, sequencing, and diagrams
          • Summarizing text to identify stated and derived implied main ideas
        • Provides specific, immediate feedback as children use these strategies to comprehend text
        • Assesses students on multiple levels using strategies and questioning techniques recommended by the NRP
        • Knowledge and skills acquired are applied to reading literature and content area text
    • The Spalding Method is built upon four major research domains
      • Domain #1: Reading Process
        • Phonemic awareness
        • Feature recognition
        • Letter recognition
        • Sound-symbol relationships (Decoding)
        • Spatial Placement
        • Vocabulary (Lexical Process)
        • Sentence structure (Syntactic process)
        • Text Comprehension (Semantic Process)
        • Domain #2: Reading Development
          • Stage 0 Pre-reading Pre-K - K
          • Stage 1 Decoding  Grades 1 - 2
          • Stage 2 Confirmation & Fluency Grades 2-3
          • Stage 3 Reading for Information Grades 4-8
        • Domain #3: Skill Learning
          • Attention Management-Task analysis-Practice to automaticity
        • Domain #4: Effective Instruction
          • Collins Cognitive Apprenticeship
            • Modeling
            • Coaching
            • Scaffolding and fading
            • Articulation
            • Reflection
            • Exploration
    • Differentiated instruction
      • With its diagnostic approach to the essential components of reading, The Spalding Method helps teachers easily create learning plans for individual children and classroom subgroups using proven instructional techniques.
        • Consistent routines
        • Multisensory techniques
        • Well-constructed pacing guides and templates
        • A variety of diagnostic tools
        • Interdisciplinary focus
    • High Quality Professional Development
      • Teacher training courses accredited by the International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council (IMSLEC) that provide high quality professional development opportunities for teachers.
    • Spalding courses focus on the skills and behaviors essential to the NRP instruction components.

    Additional Trend Information:

    Trend information is included in the current performance section including trend statements.

    Priority Performance Challenge and Associated Root Cause

    Priority Performance Challenge:  ELA and Math Achievement

    ELA and Math performance, including growth and achievement for subgroups, is lower than their peers.


    Root Cause: Teacher collaboration

    Inconsistent collaboration between general education and special education.

    Root Cause: Structures and effectiveness

    Consider structures and effectiveness available through special education to increase academic performance.

    Root Cause: Shared ownership

    Mindset that someone else will address the concerns.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  Math Growth

    Math growth for subgroups are low overall.

    Area of Focus: Math growth


    Root Cause: Linking data to instruction

    Diagnostic information is not sufficiently linked to daily effective instruction and ongoing progress monitoring.

    Root Cause Category: Data Analysis

    Root Cause: Training and development

    Students in each subgroup will benefit from ongoing staff training and professional development to improve curriculum and instruction.

    Root Cause: Low participation rates

    Parental requests for state assessment exemptions impact the amount of data collected for each subgroup.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  ELA Academic Growth

    ELA growth for subgroups are low overall

    Area of Focus: ELA growth


    Root Cause: Linking data to instruction

    Diagnostic information is not sufficiently linked to daily effective instruction and ongoing progress monitoring.

    Root Cause Category: Data Analysis


    Why were these challenges selected and what is the magnitude of the overall performance challenges:

    In ELA and Math academic gaps are typically always present for Students with Disabilities, as we know they are behind and have demonstrated skill gaps per qualification for SPED. In ELA and Math the academic gaps are still rated in the Approaching range for Students with Disabilities. This is to be expected since the population sample for this special populations group received special education services due to an educational disability that impacts their ability to learn at a rate similar to their grade level peer group.

    TCA Students with Disabilities population in 2022 had a low n sample which means there is less data available and a less accurate representation of actual student growth. In 2023, the academic growth in ELA was lower than in 2019; however, grew 3 points higher compared to 2019. 
     

    Action and Progress Monitoring Plans

    Major Improvement Strategy and Action Plan

    >

    High Quality Instruction

    What will success look like:

    Improve access strategies in the general education and special education classroom.

    Strategy Category:

    Instructional Evaluation

    Associated Root Causes:

    Structures and effectiveness: Consider structures and effectiveness available through special education to increase academic performance.

    Training and development: Students in each subgroup will benefit from ongoing staff training and professional development to improve curriculum and instruction.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    Analyze new Math curriculum performance data
    Analyze performance data over the next three years from Dimensions and CMAS and partner with Special Education to address growth and gaps in Math for students with disabilities. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals, Director of Student Support Services, and all staff In Progress
    Plan and implement curriculum review process in History and Science
    Establish curriculum committee, discuss challenges with current curriculum, investigate alternate curricula, submit evaluations, and discuss implementation. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Dean of Educational Philosophy, principals, and curriculum committee In Progress
    Monitor Students with Disabilities and Minority Students in ELA
    Analyze performance data over the next three years from Spalding, Excellence in Writing, and CMAS and partner with Special Education to address growth and gaps in ELA for students with disabilities. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals, Director of Student Support Services, and all staff In Progress
    >

    Participation Rates

    What will success look like:

    Members of school community will be adequately informed and educated on the state guidelines around state assessments, how data is used, and the importance of participation while respecting parental rights to make testing decisions for their child.

    Strategy Category:

    School or District Climate and Culture

    Associated Root Causes:

    Low participation rates: Parental requests for state assessment exemptions impact the amount of data collected for each subgroup.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    Parent Communication
    Assessment calendars will be included in community newsletters a month prior to testing. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals Not Started
    Parent Communication
    Administration will email families with students in the grade levels testing to ensure understanding of the assessment and an opportunity to ask questions. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals Not Started
    Parent Input
    Each SAC will discuss participation and how to improve buy in from the stakeholders. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals and SACs Not Started
    Assessment Presentation
    Administration will present to PTO to inform stakeholders of how data is used and why testing is important to our school. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals and PTO In Progress
    > >

    Staff Collaboration

    What will success look like:

    Improve collaboration among building-level administration, philosophy, special education, and general education to improve learning outcomes for all students.

    Describe the research/evidence base supporting the strategy:

    .

    Strategy Category:

    Data Analysis & Reflection Practices

    Associated Root Causes:

    Teacher collaboration: Inconsistent collaboration between general education and special education.

    Shared ownership: Mindset that someone else will address the concerns.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    Collaboration
    Consistent use of protocols for collaboration between general education and special education staff and shared ownership would improve both Academic Achievement and Academic Growth. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Teachers and Student Support Services staff In Progress
    Professional Development
    Develop professional development opportunities and materials to successfully implement changes and updates to math, science, and history curriculum with a focus on questioning techniques and content-based instructional methods. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Dean of Educational Philosophy, principals, and teachers In Progress
    Professional Development
    Teachers attend training on the instructional methods for the coherent, knowledge-based approach to teaching core content and building a solid foundation of knowledge. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Dean of Educational Philosophy and teachers In Progress
    Data Analysis
    Analyze performance data over the next three years from Dimensions and CMAS and partner with Special Education to address growth and gaps in Math for students with disabilities. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals and Student Support Services staff In Progress
    Collaboration
    Weekly grade level meetings and quarterly campus-wide meetings with general education and Special Education staff. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Dean of Educational Philosophy and teachers In Progress
    >

    Alignment of Curriculum and Instruction

    What will success look like:

    Improve the alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment to Colorado Academic Standards through curriculum articulation, common assessments, and professional development.

    Strategy Category:

    Curriculum and Content

    Associated Root Causes:

    Structures and effectiveness: Consider structures and effectiveness available through special education to increase academic performance.

    Linking data to instruction: Diagnostic information is not sufficiently linked to daily effective instruction and ongoing progress monitoring.

    Training and development: Students in each subgroup will benefit from ongoing staff training and professional development to improve curriculum and instruction.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    Curriculum Review Math/Science
    Investigate alternate curricula that may provide improved results, resolve challenges, or offer better alignment to our mission. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Dean of Educational Philosophy and curriculum review team In Progress
    Standard Alignment
    Discuss any challenges the current curriculum poses to student success, furthering the TCA mission, or aligning with state standards and our philosophy of education. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals and Dean of Educational Philosophy In Progress
    >

    Utilize Student Data

    What will success look like:

    Inform instructional decision making through the effective use of student data by administration, special education, and general education.

    Strategy Category:

    Data-Informed Instruction

    Associated Root Causes:

    Linking data to instruction: Diagnostic information is not sufficiently linked to daily effective instruction and ongoing progress monitoring.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    Collaboration
    Weekly meetings with general education and Special Education to inform instruction using quarterly student data. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Teachers and Student Support Services staff In Progress
    Data analysis
    Administration meets with each grade level to discuss state and school assessments and assess student needs. 08/28/2023
    05/22/2026
    Local Principals and teachers In Progress

    Progress Monitoring: Student Target Setting

    Priority Performance Challenge : ELA and Math Achievement

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Achievement (Status)

    Measures / Metrics:

    ELA
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2023-2024: TCA Elementary will work to increase the mean scale score in the subgroup of Students with Disabilities to 730.
    2024-2025:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2023-2024:

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Achievement (Status)

    Measures / Metrics:

    M
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2023-2024: TCA Elementary will work to increase the mean scale score in the subgroup of Students with Disabilities to 730.
    2024-2025:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2023-2024:

    Priority Performance Challenge : Math Growth

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Growth

    Measures / Metrics:

    M
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2023-2024: TCA Elementary will work to increase the students with disabilities growth percentile rate to 50.
    2024-2025:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2023-2024:

    Priority Performance Challenge : ELA Academic Growth

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Growth

    Measures / Metrics:

    ELA
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2023-2024: TCA Elementary will work to increase the students with disabilities growth percentile rate to 50.
    2024-2025:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2023-2024:

    Attachments List

    © 2017 State of Colorado