Colorado's Unified Improvement Plan for Schools

Fitzmorris Elementary School UIP 2021-22

      
 Download PDF

Content


  • Document icons and definitions

  • Priority Performance Challenges
  • Root Cause
  • Major Improvement Strategies
  • Action Steps
  • Progress Monitoring
  • Trend Direction

Executive Summary


Priority Performance Challenges Root Cause Major Improvement Strategies
  • CMAS Math Achievement
  • Instructional Transformation
  • Data-Driven Instruction
  • Delivery of rigorious grade level instruction.
  • Engaging Learning Environment
  • CMAS ELA Achievement
  • Instructional Transformation
  • Data-Driven Instruction
  • Delivery of rigorious grade level instruction.
  • Engaging Learning Environment
  • Acadiance Reading Read Plans
  • Instructional Transformation
  • Data-Driven Instruction
  • Delivery of rigorious grade level instruction.
  • Engaging Learning Environment
  • CMAS Math Growth
  • Instructional Transformation
  • Data-Driven Instruction
  • CMAS ELA Growth
  • Instructional Transformation
  • Data-Driven Instruction
  • Acadiance Reading Achievement
  • Instructional Transformation
  • Data-Driven Instruction


  • Access the School Performance Framework here: http://www.cde.state.co.us/schoolview/performance

    Access the Literacy Curriculum Transparency Dashboard here: https://www.cde.state.co.us/code/literacycurriculumtransparency-dashboard

    Improvement Plan Information


    Additional Information about the school



    Improvement Plan Information

    The school/district is submitting this improvement plan to satisfy requirements for (check all that apply):


    Checked
    -->

    Narrative on Data Analysis and Root Cause Identification


    Description of School Setting and Process for Data Analysis

    Fitzmorris Elementary is a neighborhood school that serves approximately 150 students (preschool through fifth grade) in Arvada, Colorado. We are a Title 1 school and receive federal funds to support our school needs. In the 2020-2021 school year, Fitzmorris’s free/reduced lunch rate was approximately 66%. Minority students make up approximately 41% of Fitzmorris’s student population and 10% of students are ELL students.  Fitzmorris’s mobility rate is approximately 13%. Fitzmorris has two Autism Spectrum Disorder center classrooms which account for 20% of the student population.  Additionally, almost 50% of our general education students are on IEP’s in addition to our students in our ASD center program. The enrollment at Fitzmorris has been steadily declining over the past several years. 

    Our families speak a variety of languages including Spanish, Nepali, Akan and Mandarin.  Our families are also diverse in their educational backgrounds and jobs.  We felt the impact of COVID on our family engagement. Family engagement had been increasing leading up to COVID. We will continue to focus on family engagement through our PTA, Parent Accountability meetings, and Parent Coffees.

    Since the 2018-2019 school year, Fitzmorris has partnered closely with the CDE Turnaround Team as well as the Jeffco Turnaround Support Team (TST).  In the fall of 2018 CDE conducted a diagnostic review to help identify the highest priority needs for the school.  From this review, in collaboration with CDE, Jeffco TST, and the stakeholders at Fitzmorris, priority indicators were identified (Culture, Data Driven Instruction, and Observation Feedback Cycles).  In the fall of the 2019-2020 school year, CDE and Jeffco TST collaborated with Fitzmorris to celebrate the move from Turnaround to Improvement and to explain the identification of Fitzmorris as an ESSA school falling in comprehensive status, meaning our achievement scores were in the lowest 5%.  Again, both CDE and Jeffco TST supported Fitzmorris in the assessment of need and identification of improvement strategies.  In the 2020-2021 school year stakeholder groups including the school instructional leadership team, CDE and TST met to analyze school data. It was elevated during this root cause analysis that performance had been declining in achievement for the past five years. An improvement in academic growth was observed in the past two years. It was also elevated that high staff turnover both in staff and administration and declining enrollment were factors in the schools current reality. Through this process the school's major improvement strategies were established. 

    This year, the 2021-2022 school year, we have engaged in collaborative process (with a variety of stakeholders) to utilize the data from state assessments, Acadiance K-3 and MAP K-5 as well as acknowledging the impact of our current reality with declining enrollment and budget deficits that led to beginning of year staffing changes to identify our root causes. Alongside CDE, TST and our instructional leadership team we identified our two major improvement strategies. The strategies were shared with the entire staff and the school accountability team for feedback and all were made aware of our ESSA status. These groups will progress monitor and provide feedback on the goals throughout the year.

     

    Prior Year Targets

    Provide a summary of your progress in implementing the Major Improvement Strategies and if they had the intended effect on systems, adult actions, and student outcomes (e.g. targets).

    The prior year targets in ELA for Acadiance and MAP for the 2020-2021 school year were not met. While we did our best to remain focused on high quality instruction for all students. The pandemic still impacted our day to day learning. We had some students leanring remotely the entire school year while others spent time in person and remotely based on district COVID protocols. Assessments were given both in person and remotely impacting assessment validity. The number of students on READ K-3 plans was only decreased by one student which is under the decrease of 10% in the priority target. When analyzing and comparing BOY to EOY Acadiance data our students K-3 that were meeting the EOY benchmark only increased by 5%, not meeting our goal of 10%. Additionally, when looking at students that met their Median Conditional Growth Percentile from the BOY to the EOY was below the 50% in grades 3rd-5th which does not meet our goal of 50% or higher. 

    As data of students was reviewed by stakeholders the need for more rigorous grade level instruction was evident. As a result we purchased a new curricular ELA resource, Wit and Wisdom. This will be paired with Geodes and Fundations to ensure that we are also providing targeted foundational skills instruction in grades K-3. Additionally, we will engage in staff wide LETRS training to build our understanding of the foundation of reading and deepen our instructional toolbox. 


    Based on your reflection and evaluation, provide a summary of the adjustments that you will make for this year's plan.

    This data and reflection directly impacted our first major improvement strategy for the 2021-2022 school year. Utilizng our ELA resources (Wit and Wisdom, Geodes and Fundations) all students will engage and demonstrate proficiency on grade level work through the delivery of quality core instruction. We will continue to support teachers through data driven instruction, observation/feedback and monitoring of student data. We will also ensure that our master schedule is aligned to have a literacy block that ensures the appropriate amount of time for each resource. 

    Current Performance

    Due to COVID in the 2020-2021 school year students at each grade level either took ELA or Math so there are still gaps in our data. The achievement in 3rd grade ELA for the 2020-2021 school year dropped from the previous 3rd grade achievement scores we had in 2018-2019. Our 5th grade achievement in 2020-2021 was a significant increase from the 2018-2019 school year. Our fourth grade math data is significant as it has been at 0% of students meets/exceed for both the 2018-2019 and 2020 school year.  Our achievement scores are still low enough to warrant comprehensive status as a school with achievement in the bottom 5% of Title schools. 

    CMAS Achievement Scores for Fitzmorris Elementary - ELA

    School Year

    3rd Meets/Exceeds

    4th Meets/Exceeds

    5th Meets/Exceeds

    2020-2021

    18%

    NA

    50%

    2019-2020

    NA

    NA

    NA

    2018-2019

    27.3%

    22.7%

    21.7%

    2017-2018

    15.4%

    20.9%

    15%

    CMAS Achievement Scores for Fitzmorris Elementary - Math

    School Year

    3rd Meets/Exceeds

    4th Meets/Exceeds

    5th Meets/Exceeds

    2020-2021

    NA

    0%

    NA

    2019-2020

    NA

    NA

    NA

    2018-2019

    24.2%

    0%

    8.7%

    2017-2018

    19.2%

    4.2%

    0%

     

    CMAS Achievement Scores for Fitzmorris Elementary - Science

    School Year

    5th Meets/Exceeds

    2020-2021

    NA

    2019-2020

    NA

    2018-2019

    8.7%

    2017-2018

    5.3%

     

    Due to COVID we continue to not have growth data for ELA/Math. Additionally, our N continues to be too small to report out on each grade level and in some cases to report out at all. 

    CMAS Growth Scores for Fitzmorris Elementary 

    Our N-size is too small to report out at each grade

    School Year

    ELA - Overall MGP

    Math - Overall MGP

    2020-2021

    NA due to COVID

    NA due to COVID

    2019-2020 (COVID)

    NA due to COVID

    NA due to COVID

    2018-2019 (4th and 5th)

    50.0 MGP

    33.0 MGP

    2017-2018 (4th and 5th)

    33.5 MGP

    16.0 MGP

    2016-2017 (4th, 5th and 6th)

    48.0 MGP

    30.0 MGP

     

    Fitzmorris is a small school and therefore doesn't have a large enough N-size to have subgroup data available in most highly detailed subgroups, therefore the following information is the most reliable disaggregated data available.  General trends for the following disaggregated data from CMAS show that our non-minority students perform higher than our minority students (this is in line with the trend from the state as well).  Fitzmorris underperforms compared to the state in almost all categories, with the performance of students who qualify for FRL being the closest to the state.  This data also confirms the trend of decreasing achievement bottoming out in the 2017-2018 school year, with the 2018-2019 school year showing trends toward increasing achievement.  Lastly, this data confirms that Fitzmorris is performing higher in ELA than in math.

    Disaggregated CMAS Data by Subgroup - ELA

    Scores Listed as Mean Scale Scores

    School Year

    Fitz vs. CO

    Minority Students

    Non-Minority Students

    FRL Eligible

    Not FRL Eligible

    2020-2021

    Fitzmorris

    739

    *

    *

    *

    Colorado

    749.9

    759.1

    738.6

    759.5

    2019-2020

     

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    2018-2019

    Fitzmorris

    717.1

    737.5

    724.5

    734.7

    Colorado

    733.8

    753.3

    729.2

    755.6

    2017-2018

    Fitzmorris

    719.5

    730.6

    727.7

    723.8

    Colorado

    733.4

    752.4

    728.9

    755.1

    2016-2017

    Fitzmorris

    731.1

    739.9

    736

    736.4

    Colorado

    732

    751

    727.6

    753.9

    *Our N is not large enough for a Mean Scale Score to be available for the 2020-2021 school year due to limited participation.

    Disaggregated CMAS Data by Subgroup - Math

    Scores Listed as Mean Scale Scores

    School Year

    Fitz vs. CO

    All Students

    Minority Students

    Non-Minority Students

    FRL Eligible

    Not FRL Eligible

    2020-2021

    FItzmorris

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    Colorado

    742.3

    737.7

    744.6

    722.5

    745.7

    2019-2020

     

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    2018-2019

    Fitzmorris

    716.3

    710.1

    722.4

    714.3

    721.2

    Colorado

    737.2

    727.8

    745.8

    723.3

    748

    2017-2018

    Fitzmorris

    712.2

    704.7

    717.1

    711.8

    713

    Colorado

    743.4

    727.1

    745.4

    722.7

    748

    2016-2017

    Fitzmorris

    722.1

    716.2

    726.6

    720.5

    724.8

    Colorado

    736.6

    726.6

    745.7

    722.6

    748.3

    *Our N is not large enough for a Mean Scale Score to be available for the 2020-2021 school year due to limited participation.

    Due to N size for students with IEP's we could not insert specific data. However, there is a signifcant gap between the percentage of students without IEP's meeting or exceeding in both Math and ELA CMAS achievement compared to students with IEPs.

     

    This Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) data confirms the same trends as the data shown above.  2017-2018 shows very low growth (consistent with achievement and growth trends from CMAS).  While this MAP data certainly highlights some grade levels as growing faster than others, it does show the general trend of growth starting in 2018-2019 and continuing into the 2019-2020 school year. It also demonstrates consistency with CMAS in growth being lower in math than ELA. 

    MAP Scores for Fitzmorris Elementary - ELA

    School Conditional Growth Percentile

    School Year

    3rd 

    4th 

    5th 

    2020-2021 (BOY-MOY)

    7

    21

    3

    2020-2021 (BOY-MOY)

    1

    1

    1

    2019-2020 (BOY-MOY)

    67

    26

    95

    2018-2019 (BOY-EOY)

    59

    18

    23

    2017-2018 (BOY-EOY)

    42

    1

    1

     

    MAP Scores for Fitzmorris Elementary - Math

    School Conditional Growth Percentile

    School Year

    3rd 

    4th

    5th 

    2020-2021 (BOY-MOY)

    1

    5

    72

    2020-2021 (BOY-MOY)

    1

    18

    38

    2019-2020 (BOY-MOY)

    5

    1

    1

    2018-2019 (BOY-EOY)

    69

    44

    13

    2017-2018 (BOY-EOY)

    10

    1

    1

     

    ACCESS Testing for ELLS

    ​​​​​​​Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, state and district assessments were not administered in the spring of 2020.  Fitzmorris does use ACCESS testing data to plan for sheltered instruction for students who are language learners.  However, our N-size is not 16 or more, and therefore we don’t have detailed ACCESS data at the school level.

     

    READ Plans

    Last year students were taking assessments both in person and remotely due to COVID. At the end of last school year only 25% of our students met or exceeded the expectation on EOY Acadiance data. This is a significant increase from the 2018-2019 school year when 52% of students met or exceeded the expectation (we do not have EOY data from 2019-2020 due to COVID). Historically, READ plans continue to increase at Fitzmorris. 

     

    Acadiance Data K-3

     

    2019-2020

    2020-2021

    2021-2022

    Grade

    BOY Red/Yellow Composite

    MOY Red/Yellow Composite

    BOY Red/Yellow Composite

    MOY Red/Yellow Composite

    EOY Red/Yellow Composite

    BOY Red/Yellow Composite

    K

    50%

    39%

    46%

    100%

    75%

    87%

    1st

    88%

    72%

    81%

    65%

    57%

    67%

    2nd

    52%

    50%

    65%

    57%

    62%

    62%

    3rd

    46%

    54%

    54%

    74%

    23%

    55%

     

    READ plans continue to be a concern that will be addressed in our Priority Performance Challenges. After analyzing BOY Acadiance data, there are 61 students (53.5%) that are either on or eligible for a READ plan and of these 61 students, 30 are students with IEP’s. 


    ​​​​​​​

     
     

    Trend Analysis

    Trend Direction: Decreasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Achievement (Status)

    The majority of Fitzmorris Elementary students have not met or exceeded CMAS Math expectations between 2016-2020. School-wide averages of students meeting/exceeding expectations for math has decreased from 12%(2016-17), to .08%(2017-18), and then increased to 13%(2018-2019) and decreased to 0%(2020-2021). This trend is notable in showing that far less than 80% of students are meeting/exceeding expectations on CMAS. While the data for the 2020-2021 school year was only that of fourth grade students due to assessment changes during COVID schoolwide data would support that 3rd and 5th grade data would still be far below 80% and on a downward trend.
    Trend Direction: Decreasing then increasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Achievement (Status)

    The majority of Fitzmorris Elementary students have not met or exceeded CMAS ELA expectations from 2016-2020. School-wide averages of students meeting/exceeding expectations for ELA has decreased from 28.9%(2016-17), to 17%(2017-18), and then increased to 24.3%(2018-2019), to 50%(2019-2020). This trend is notable in two ways: first, the average percentage of students meeting/exceeding expectations had been decreasing until two years ago when we have seen an increase. While the data for the 2020-2021 school year was only that of 3rd and 5th grade students due to assessment changes during COVID it does show a 25% increase in a year. However, our achievement data in ELA is still well below 80%.
    Trend Direction: Decreasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Achievement (Status)

    The achievement trends for Fitzmorris Elementary students consistently declined from 2017-2021 for Acadience (DIBELS). The percent of students meeting or exceeding the End of Year benchmark has consistently decreased from 67% (2017-18), to 52% (2018-19), to no EOY data (2019-20), to 43% (2020-21). This trend is notable in that we have a significant decline in the number of students demonstrating proficiency on early literacy skills. Our data is well below district averages for students meeting or exceeding end of year Acadiance benchmarks.
    Trend Direction: Decreasing then increasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Growth

    We continue to not have growth data for CMAS due to COVID 19. Trend statement based on previous data trends and other formative assessments. The growth trend for Fitzmorris Elementary students consistently declined from 2015-2018 and then increased in 2019 for CMAS Math. The MGP for all students in math has consistently decreased from 51 MGP (2015-16), to 30 MGP (2016-17), to 16 MGP (2017-18), and then increased to 33 MGP (2018-2019). This trend is notable in two ways: first, the MGP for all students in CMAS Math has consistently decreased in the past three years until last year; second, while there was an increase last year, the trend still shows that Fitzmorris students are drastically under performing compared to the district and the state. Other formative data, including student growth data on MAP, would indicate that students are still drastically underperforming compared to the district and state.
    Trend Direction: Decreasing then increasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Academic Growth

    We continue to not have growth data for CMAS due to COVID 19. Trend statement based on previous data trends and other formative assessments. The growth trends for Fitzmorris Elementary students consistently declined from 2015-2019 for CMAS ELA. The MGP for all students in ELA has consistently decreased from 59 MGP (2015-16), to 48 MGP (2016-17), to 33.5 MGP (2017-18), and then increased to 50 MGP (2018-2019). This trend is notable in two ways: first, the MGP for all students in CMAS ELA has consistently decreased in the past three years until last year; second, while there was an increase last year that puts Fitzmorris at the same growth rate as the state, the trend shows that Fitzmorris students are still under performing compared to the district. Other formative data, including student growth data on MAP, would indicate that students are still drastically underperforming compared to the district and state.
    Trend Direction: Decreasing
    Performance Indicator Target: Student Behavior

    The trends for disruptive student behavior for Fitzmorris Elementary students are decreasing from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019. The number of Tier III behavior referrals has decreased from 545 (2017-2018), to 144 (2018-2019), and then increased to 151 (2019-2020). It is notebale that there was a decrease of over 70% in Tier III referals in a year. This is a notable trend because it shows that systems are forming that will allow students to focus on teaching, learning, and growing. In 2019-2020 the number of Tier III referrals was 151, however there was a decrease in Tier II referrals (Due to the COVID-19 pandemic exact numbers for last year are not available). The data for the 2020-2021 school year does not feel reliable as we had consistently less students present in the school building and in classroom due COVID and the remote learning option. Current school year data would support that overall disruptive student behavior is on the decline at Fitzmorris.

    Additional Trend Information:

    While our trends show some increases throughout the data set presented, overall the data indicates our students are performing significanly below the district and state in achievement and growth. 

    Priority Performance Challenge and Associated Root Cause

    Priority Performance Challenge:  CMAS Math Achievement

    Our CMAS trend data and 4th grade achievement data of 0% of students meeting or exceeding expectations in math indicate a need to prioritize math as a priority performance challenge. The representative data indicates that student achievement show a significant gap from where Fitzmorris was 6 to 7 years ago, and where the district and state are currently performing.


    Root Cause: Instructional Transformation

    Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Root Cause: Data-Driven Instruction

    Fitzmorris staff needs to deepen their understanding how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  CMAS ELA Achievement

    Our CMAS trend data and 3rd and 5th grade achievement data of 50% (2020-21) do demonstrate some increase in ELA proficiency in percentage of students meeting or exceeding expectations. While there is evidence of small gains, the overall trend data indicates a need to prioritize ELA as a priority performance challenge. The representative data indicates that student achievement show a significant gap from where Fitzmorris was 6 to 7 years ago, and where the district and state are currently performing.


    Root Cause: Instructional Transformation

    Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Root Cause: Data-Driven Instruction

    Fitzmorris staff needs to deepen their understanding how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  Acadiance Reading Read Plans

    The number of students on READ plans continue to be a concern for Fitzmorris. After analyzing BOY Acadiance data, there are 61 students (53.5%) that are either on or eligible for a READ plan and of these 61 students, 30 are students with IEP’s. The number of students being exited from READ plans is minimal if at all. This indicates a serious gap in students overall proficiency in early literacy skills and is a priority performance challenge.


    Root Cause: Instructional Transformation

    Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Root Cause: Data-Driven Instruction

    Fitzmorris staff needs to deepen their understanding how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  CMAS Math Growth

    While we do not have current CMAS math growth data our data on MAP MGP remains signifcantly below the 55th percentile and this continues to be a priority performance challenge. Our data trends indicate a significant gap from where Fitzmorris was 6 to 7 years ago, and where the district and state are currently performing.


    Root Cause: Instructional Transformation

    Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Root Cause: Data-Driven Instruction

    Fitzmorris staff need a better understanding of how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  CMAS ELA Growth

    While we do not have current CMAS ELA growth data our data on MAP MGP remains signifcantly below the 55th percentile and this continues to be a priority performance challenge. Our data trends indicate a significant gap from where Fitzmorris was 6 to 7 years ago, and where the district and state are currently performing.


    Root Cause: Instructional Transformation

    Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Root Cause: Data-Driven Instruction

    Fitzmorris staff need a better understanding of how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.


    Priority Performance Challenge:  Acadiance Reading Achievement

    It is clear that the overall percentage of students meeting or exceeding on the Acaidance EOY benchmark has been steadily declining. We have over half our students that are lacking the foundational skills necesarry to be successful readers. This continues to be a priority performance challenge.


    Root Cause: Instructional Transformation

    Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Root Cause: Data-Driven Instruction

    Fitzmorris staff need a better understanding of how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.


    Why were these challenges selected and what is the magnitude of the overall performance challenges:

    CMAS is a measure of our students academic achievement compared to the rest of the state.  In order for our students to be competitive, the should in turn meet/exceed the state expectations. Additionally, the fact that over half our K-3 students are not meeting the benchmark on Acaidance indicates a true need. The magnitude of the need for improvement in both CMAS and on READ Plans demonstrates why Fitzmorris is currently in comprehensive status. By making progress toward these priority performance challenges, more of our students will be prepared to succeed academically. 

     

    How were the Root Causes were selected and verified:

    Fitzmorris has partnered with the CDE Turnaround Network and the Jeffco Turnaround Support Team (TST) since the fall of 2018.  In collaboration with CDE and Jeffco TST, Fitzmorris has identify needs and improvement strategies to address those needs.  The Fitzmorris Instructional Leadership Team consisting of 7 members (3 classroom teachers, a SPED teacher, instructional coach, DTL, and principal). The ILT supported the analysis of assessment data (from previous years) were examined to give a comprehensive data profile (including CMAS, Acadience and MAP). For the past two years the staff has been engaging in identifying root causes of gaps in student leaning and low achievement. Concurrently, Fitzmorris continues to partner with the CDE Turnaround Network and regularly accesses progress monitoring data from that team.  Based on the outcome of the root cause analysis in conjunction with the Turnaround support, Fitzmorris's School Goals were developed and adjustments were made to the UIP Major Improvement Strategies and Action Steps (these Major Improvement Strategies and Action Steps are found in the CDE Progress Monitoring Tool (PM Tool)). Additional stakeholders including the Fitzmorris staff, and the School Accountability Committee (SAC) also had opportunities to review and give input on the findings of leadership team. This process ensured all Fitzmorris stakeholders were invested in the data analysis and creation of the UIP.  ILT and SAC progress monitor the action plan and progress toward Major Improvement Strategy goals monthly, as well as CDE and Jeffco TST.  

     

    Additional Narrative / Conclusion

    Our data indicates that we are an ESSA school in comprehensive status. Our data indicates our students are performing significanlty below the district and state. We will continue to utilize our learning from Relay to support the growth and development of teachers. Our teachers will meet weekly in data driven instruction meetings to plan instruction aligned to grade level standards and monitor student work/data. Teachers will also recieve observation/feedback cycles focused on buildng their instructional toolbox. We will maintain our focus on social emotional learning and ensuring that our routines and procedures stay strong to support a focus on learning. 

    Action and Progress Monitoring Plans

    Major Improvement Strategy and Action Plan

    >

    Delivery of rigorious grade level instruction.

    What will success look like:

    Refer to CDE PM Tool (Attached)

    Describe the research/evidence base supporting the strategy:

    We will be focused on developing and solidifying our academic tier 1 MTSS structures and practices throughout the implementation of our new resources Wit and Wisdom, Fundations, Geodes and Eureka. This approach is informed by the article "The Opportunity Myth" and the book by Paul Bambrick-Santoyo called “Get Better Faster.” "The Opportunity Myth" identifies 4 key resources that student need in their daily experience. Those four resources are consistent opportunities to work on grade appropriate assignments, strong instruction where students do most of the thinking, deep engagement in what they're learning, and teachers who hold high expectations for students and believe they can meet grade-level standard. "Getting Better Faster" lays out a framework for how to coach teachers on best instructional strategies that will transform instruction to meet the expectation and rigor of the Common Core Standards. The book is based off of experience and research around a progression effective strategies that will transform a learning environment and lead to high growth and achievement. This will address our ESSA status of comprehensive, and help us increase student achievement to get out of the bottom 5%.

    Associated Root Causes:

    Instructional Transformation: Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Data-Driven Instruction: Fitzmorris staff needs to deepen their understanding how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status
    >

    Engaging Learning Environment

    What will success look like:

    Refer to CDE PM Tool (Attached)

    Describe the research/evidence base supporting the strategy:

    The school will work with staff, students, and families to create and support a culture that promotes student engagement to ensure learning happens at a high level. We will focus on ensuring that all stakeholders have a voice within our community and decision making processes. Additionally, school wide procedures and social emotional learning are implemented to ensure that we are creating a physically and emotionally safe envorinment so that students can focus on learning. The work by Paul Bambrick-Santoyo in his book "Leverage Leadership" indicates the importance of focusing on student and staff culture in order for high levels of learning to take place. This work on building an inclusive culture will support us addressing our ESSA status of comprehensive, and help us increase student achievement to get out of the bottom 5%.

    Associated Root Causes:

    Instructional Transformation: Fitzmorris teachers need additional support and resources to help ensure that they are planning for rigorous and high quality grade level instruction.

    Data-Driven Instruction: Fitzmorris staff needs to deepen their understanding how to use assessment data to influence remediation and intervention instruction as well as scaffolds to help students access grade level content and standards.

    Implementation Benchmarks Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Benchmark Name Description Start/End/Repeats Key Personnel Status

    Action Steps Associated with Major Improvement Strategy

    Name Description Start/End Date Resource Key Personnel Status

    Progress Monitoring: Student Target Setting

    Priority Performance Challenge : CMAS Math Achievement

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Achievement (Status)

    Measures / Metrics:

    M
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2021-2022: At least 40% of students will meet or exceed the expectation on CMAS Math.
    2022-2023:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2021-2022:

    Priority Performance Challenge : CMAS ELA Achievement

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Achievement (Status)

    Measures / Metrics:

    ELA
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2021-2022: At least 40% of students will meet or exceed the expectation on CMAS ELA.
    2022-2023:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2021-2022:

    Priority Performance Challenge : Acadiance Reading Read Plans

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Achievement (Status)

    Measures / Metrics:

    R
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2021-2022: Decrease the number of students in grades K-3 on READ plans by 15%.
    2022-2023:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2021-2022:

    Priority Performance Challenge : CMAS Math Growth

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Growth

    Measures / Metrics:

    R
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2021-2022: Student academic reading growth will meet or exceed the 55th percentile.
    2022-2023:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2021-2022:

    Priority Performance Challenge : CMAS ELA Growth

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Growth

    Measures / Metrics:

    ELA
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2021-2022: Student academic reading growth will meet or exceed the 55th percentile.
    2022-2023:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2021-2022:

    Priority Performance Challenge : Acadiance Reading Achievement

    Performance Indicator:

    Academic Achievement (Status)

    Measures / Metrics:

    R
    ANNUAL
    PERFORMANCE
    TARGETS
    2021-2022: Increase the number of students meeting EOY Benchmark on Acadiance by 30% in grades K-3.
    2022-2023:

    INTERIM MEASURES FOR 2021-2022:

    Attachments List

    © 2017 State of Colorado